SOPA isn’t all bad
Driving home from Boulder this afternoon in the snow, I was listening to someone on the Thom Hartmann show talking all about the evils of SOPA. They said it’s about government censorship of the internet. He admitted that sites post copyrighted material, but dismissed this as a problem. He said that all you have to do is take them to court.
I can tell you this is an oversimplification and a dismissal of a real problem for writers. It isn’t all that simple, and who has the money to take people to court when they can go out the next day and post it all over again?
Many people send take-down letters to people who post their books for free on websites–books the author still has the copyright to and that are still actively being sold. Many sites respond to these letters. Others do not, arguing obscurely legalistic reasoning that they don’t provide the content, just the link to the content. Once a book is taken down, it often pops up again somewhere else.
I have a friend who just quit sending out take-down letters. She said she could do that or write. It was just too time consuming. Most authors don’t make much money on their writing. Many refer to it as coffee money. So, where’s the harm, you say? If writers get enough things in print, it can add up and eventually turn into a full time job.
Shouldn’t people be paid for their work? It can take up to a year to write a novel, sometimes two or more if you have a day job.
Of course, on the other side many people argue that giving free books away sells more books. And there is evidence for this. Corey Doctorow will swear by this business model as do many publishers. This could be true, but shouldn’t it be the writer’s decision, not some random person who decides to copy the book and post it?
I say SOPA isn’t such a bad thing. Let’s protect our writers.

Justine Graykin on 12 Jan 2012 at 8:44 am #
In principle, I agree that we should be paid for our work. However, in reality, the odds are huge that we will never be paid what we are worth, and in fact, that is not why we write. I would be just delighted if I could share the body of work which I have created over the years out of my passion for writing with an audience. However, because of a litany of reasons none of which have anything to do with the actually quality of the work, only a tiny fraction of my work has been published, for which I have earned a pittance. I would consider piracy the sincerest form of flattery. But I understand the objections of other writers, and respect their arguments as valid, even if I disagree.
However, the terrible danger of SOPA is its potential for abuse. Whatever small benefit of actually protecting copyrights it may offer, the chilling effect on Internet sharing and creativity vastly outweighs it. One small, if real and legitimate problem is solved by creating a frightening monster. That is why I oppose SOPA. Piracy is wrong, but unlimited government censorship far, far worse.
CasandraHenrich on 18 Jan 2012 at 10:38 am #
Yes, SOPA is not bad after all, the reasons for supporting SOPA is for protecting the intellectual property marketing as well as with the corresponding industries in strengthening enforcement. Let us support SOPA.
CasandraHenrich´s last [type] ..Local Search Seo Los Angeles
JennyGreyson on 20 Jan 2012 at 8:16 am #
I think these SOPA have a huge help for every body, That’s why I supported it ideas.
JennyGreyson´s last [type] ..RSA Certificate
theresacrater on 20 Jan 2012 at 8:46 am #
Now that lots of people have posted here and there, I agree this law goes too far. But the basic idea of not stealing other people’s work is a good one. I hope they can figure out a way to deal with it. Or we could just go back to the old bard system. Or patronage system. Or . . . Sweden is talking about a guaranteed minimum income for life because so much is automated now that fewer people are needed in the work force.
Catherine on 19 Feb 2012 at 8:31 pm #
This is totally nuts.. While I believe that there should be a form to “protect” copyright infringements, I think that the way the SOPA as it looks, may seriously hamper the overall efficiency of the internet… It comes to a point that I have to think if when writing a post, I can or can not use say the word “Apple”…
Catherine´s last [type] ..Heavy Machinery
Sylvia on 22 Feb 2012 at 9:10 pm #
ACTA 2.0 is like a backdoor way to enact SOPA. ACTA had move forward in Europe despite protests.
Sylvia´s last [type] ..Goldnsilverblog
Anita from Bikini Wax Video on 12 Apr 2012 at 4:24 am #
I wish that people who got so vocal over this cause did so for better and more just reasons that wanting to be able to continue stealing copyrighted content like music and television shows online.